WWW.ASTROPHOTOGALLERY.ORG

Photo Gallery   Forum     Events Calendar



« Previous image · Next image »



Coma Corrector Comparision, with and without
Coma Corrector Comparision, with and without

Click on image to view larger image

« Previous image  · Slide Show · Next image »

Paul Walker

*




Registered: November 2009
Location: Middlebury, Vermont
Posts: 116
users gallery
Using a Baader Multi Purpose Coma Corrector.
They were taken through the 4.25” f/4 scope.
The top image is without the coma corrector, the bottom with it.
Mostly look at the stars (though some of the difference in the nebula is due to the corrector).
These are crops of larger images. The center of the frames are near the rigth.
The comparison isn’t quite apples to apple as the top image is slightly out of focus, taken on a slightly hazy night (the day I got the corrector), is a stack of 3 verses 7 (4 min) images for the bottom and no dark/flats for the uncorrected image.
Many more stars are visible in frame edge of the coma corrected image and they are round, not oval.
----------------------------------------------------
This summer I starting thinking about getting an apochromatic refractor and a f/ratio reducer/field flattener. I was looking at a Borg 80mm f/3.9 setup. I wasn’t so keen on spending $2000 though, so I got to thinking about cobbling together a short focus reflector instead. I have three 4.25” f/4 finder scopes that I had build over the years for my 10” scope and a 4.5” f/8 (source of the 2" diag) that I built as a guide scope for the 10” (none of these were currently being used). Among them I had one good 4.25” f/4 mirror and one good 2” diagonal mirror and 2 good tube assemblies. A couple years ago at the Stellafane swap tables I bought a 2” Crayford style focuser with dual speed focus for $80 and this year a couple 8x50 finders with dovetail mounts for about $30 each.
Taking images with the resulting 4.25 f/4 scope (f/4.4 equiv. with the 2" obstruction) worked well except for the coma. Coma correctors range from about $150 to $250. I purchased a Baader Multi Purpose Coma Corrector (MPCC) (the astrophoto setup only) for $145. It is optimized for f/4.5 optics and does not change the focal length (does not reduce or magnify the image).


FYI, the same image brightness requires only 4 minutes in the 4” f/4 (f/4.4 equiv) compared to 7 minutes in the 10” f/5.6 (f5.8 equiv).


I extracted this from an article I wrote for our local club's Winter newsletter.
· Views: 463 · Filesize: 555.6kb, 213.6kb · Dimensions: 1961 x 1212 ·
Quick Rate: Poor Excellent
Additional Categories: Equipment photos

« more
M81_M82_11x12min_10inf5_6_2010-03-17_wav1_chist_hist_unshp-cc-hist-_medium_.jpg
Horsehead_Neb_9x8min_10in_f5_6_2010-03-10_NR_chist-chist-unshp-hist-cc-_Medium_.jpg
M65_66_NGC3629_11x8min_10inf5_6_2010-03-16_sat_15_dodge_burn_cc_NR_Medium_.jpg
M65_66_NGC3629_11x8min_10inf5_6_2010-03-16_cc-hist_dodge_burn-_Medium_.jpg
Leo_1_Dwarf_Galaxy_10x8min_10inf5_wav1_chist1_NR1_hist1_unshpR3T5_chist-_med_.jpg
Horsehead_Neb_14x3min_4_25in_f3_9_2010-03-06_chist-chist-unshp_NR2-hist2-cc_med_.jpg
M13_NGC6207_stkof28_1min_wav1_NR-hist_NR-hist-colorhist_Large.jpg
Video_Guider_Montage_C4-1.jpg
M33_19x8min_hist_rgb1-cc_NR_B1b2NRb5-cc_NR_B_-dark-1-cc-hist2-1_unshp_NR2-cc3.jpg
M81_82_10x5min_wav2_NR_stch_NR_strch_comb60sec_sat_hist_cc-hist-Large.jpg
Without_and_With_Coma_Corr_N_American_Neb.jpg
Gibbous_Moon_High_Contrast_10in_f5_6_0_004sec_iso100_hist_unshp-unshp.jpg
M33_2009-11-17_R1r2NRr5_G1g2g3_27d_g3_B1b2NRb5-cc_NR-cc_NR-hist-cc-chist3.jpg
Cresent_Neb_2009-12-06_10x8min_iso1600_10in_f5_R_NRr1-unshp-r2-G1G2-B1b2-Medium.jpg
M33_2009-11-17_10x8min_iso1600_10in_f5_27degDrk_R1r2NRr5_G1g2g3_27d_g3_B1b2NRb5-cc_NR-Large.jpg
Horsehead_4x8min_10inF5_6_Rh2_Gh2_Bh2-unshp_NR-1-autoCB-_large_.jpg
Paul_s_10in_f5_6_Newtonian.jpg
Test_unstacked_4_image_mosaic_NR-sat-hist-cc-hist2_NR-hist3-cropped.jpg
Comet_Holmes_Combined_11_darkened_B_1710x1290_.jpg
M51_15x12m_10inF5_2010-04-14_wav2-chist-cc-1-unshpR5wmsk-chist-blurwmsk-cc-crop0_75-text-med.JPG
Helix_Neb_2009-11-16_11x8min_R-h1h2h3NR_h5_Rmask3_G-h1h2_B-h1h2NR.jpg
· more »

admin
*

System Admin ( Gene Hunter )

Registered: May 2008
Location: Bethune, SC
Posts: 810
Sun January 3, 2010 12:45

quite a difference

------------------------------
Clear Skies
Paul Walker
*


Registered: November 2009
Location: Middlebury, Vermont
Posts: 116
Sun January 3, 2010 13:45

This particular corrector is suposed to be usable from f/4 to f/6.


The North American Neb shots are the only ones I've taken with the intent of doing a comparison.


I should have before and after for the 10" f/5.6, I haven't looked to see if I have any usable comparision shots. It does improve the 10" some, though the sensor size (APS-C) in the Rebels makes them pretty good without a coma correction at f/5.6.
hewholooks
*

Hunter Wilson

Registered: May 2008
Location: Central Ohio
Posts: 694
Sun January 3, 2010 13:51

The corrector looks to be extremely effective, Paul. The comparison will undoubtedly be very helpful to those considering such a device. Very nice.

Photo Sharing Gallery by PhotoPost
Copyright © 2007 All Enthusiast, Inc.

Images placed on this site can be used by students or professional astronomers as long as credit is given to the person who took the photo, otherwise though No portion of this page, text, images or code, may be copied, reproduced, published or distributed in any medium without the expressed written permission of the copyright holder.